Musings on the Golden Cross

Over time, buying when the 50-day moving average crosses above the 200-day average has been a winning strategy. You do not buy the low and sell the high but you do usually get on the right side of the trend.

With a few exceptions, it really worked well for decades. Or should I say during secular bull markets?

The current secular bear has not been so nice for this strategy. And it was rather lousy in 2010 to the present.

Check this out. If you sold the downside cross in 2011 and bought the upside cross in 2011 you held a losing position for five-plus months.

I projected the next cross to occur a month or two from now and it looks like you will sell at a loss, or breakeven at best if your bought the cross in January. And the same sort of thing happened before this chart in 2010.

What? Wasn't the golden cross in January a great buy signal? Well, yes it was if taken on its own. But what in this simple analysis told you when it was really time to sell instead of having to wait for the downside cross and a complete loss of profits?

I have not tested this over prior secular bulls and bears but it does show that something about the past few years sure does not lend itself to the tools of prior periods. I think these tools will once again start to work as intended but for now, caveat analyticum.

Lots of jobs

Here is another observation on the economy that flies in the face of, well, my face and beliefs. A walk down the streets of downtown Huntington, NY, one of the larger "metropolises" on Long Island (yes, I chuckled writing that) turned up something peculiar - Help Wanted signs. All kinds of stores, too. if you want a job, go to Huntington and pick the one you like.

But here's the catch - they are all minimum wage. My own college age kid is cutting up vegetables and shrink wrapping them for sale at the local supermarket. $7.25 per hour with a 15-minute break in a five-hour shift. He is not getting rich.

I think it's great. Start low, aim high, build character and earn a paycheck. The capitalist way. But that's not the point of this post. The point is that unemployment, at least in this area, does not have to be so high at the bottom of earning spectrum.

Supporting a family is a different issue.

You all can discuss the politics of all this.